🔗 Share this article

Throughout the beginning sections of the publication Authentic, speaker the author raises a critical point: everyday directives to “come as you are” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are far from well-meaning invitations for individuality – they can be pitfalls. This initial publication – a combination of personal stories, investigation, cultural critique and conversations – aims to reveal how businesses appropriate personal identity, moving the burden of institutional change on to individual workers who are often marginalized.

Professional Experience and Broader Context

The impetus for the publication stems partly in the author’s professional path: different positions across corporate retail, startups and in global development, interpreted via her experience as a woman of color with a disability. The two-fold position that Burey experiences – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and aiming for security – is the engine of the book.

It arrives at a period of widespread exhaustion with organizational empty phrases across America and other regions, as resistance to diversity and inclusion efforts increase, and various institutions are reducing the very frameworks that previously offered progress and development. Burey delves into that landscape to contend that backing away from corporate authenticity talk – specifically, the business jargon that trivializes identity as a set of surface traits, idiosyncrasies and interests, forcing workers preoccupied with handling how they are viewed rather than how they are treated – is not an effective response; rather, we should reinterpret it on our own terms.

Underrepresented Employees and the Act of Persona

By means of detailed stories and conversations, Burey shows how marginalized workers – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, female employees, people with disabilities – quickly realize to modulate which persona will “pass”. A weakness becomes a disadvantage and people compensate excessively by striving to seem palatable. The act of “showing your complete identity” becomes a display surface on which numerous kinds of anticipations are cast: emotional work, sharing personal information and ongoing display of gratitude. In Burey’s words, workers are told to share our identities – but without the defenses or the reliance to endure what emerges.

According to the author, we are asked to share our identities – but without the protections or the reliance to survive what emerges.’

Illustrative Story: Jason’s Experience

Burey demonstrates this dynamic through the account of Jason, a employee with hearing loss who decided to inform his team members about deaf community norms and communication practices. His eagerness to talk about his life – an act of openness the office often commends as “authenticity” – for a short time made routine exchanges smoother. However, Burey points out, that improvement was unstable. When employee changes wiped out the casual awareness the employee had developed, the atmosphere of inclusion dissolved with it. “All of that knowledge went away with the staff,” he notes wearily. What remained was the weariness of needing to begin again, of being held accountable for an company’s developmental journey. In Burey’s view, this is what it means to be told to expose oneself without protection: to face exposure in a system that praises your honesty but declines to codify it into procedure. Sincerity becomes a snare when institutions count on personal sharing rather than institutional answerability.

Writing Style and Notion of Opposition

Her literary style is at once clear and expressive. She marries academic thoroughness with a style of kinship: an offer for followers to engage, to interrogate, to dissent. In Burey’s opinion, dissent at work is not overt defiance but ethical rejection – the act of resisting conformity in workplaces that expect gratitude for mere inclusion. To resist, according to her view, is to challenge the narratives institutions describe about equity and belonging, and to reject involvement in practices that perpetuate inequity. It may appear as naming bias in a discussion, withdrawing of unpaid “equity” work, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s personal life is offered to the company. Resistance, she suggests, is an affirmation of personal dignity in settings that often reward obedience. It is a discipline of integrity rather than defiance, a approach of maintaining that one’s humanity is not conditional on corporate endorsement.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses brittle binaries. Authentic does not merely eliminate “sincerity” wholesale: rather, she urges its redefinition. According to the author, authenticity is far from the raw display of character that corporate culture typically applauds, but a more deliberate harmony between one’s values and personal behaviors – an integrity that resists distortion by institutional demands. As opposed to considering sincerity as a directive to disclose excessively or adjust to sanitized ideals of transparency, Burey urges followers to preserve the elements of it grounded in sincerity, individual consciousness and moral understanding. From her perspective, the goal is not to give up on authenticity but to move it – to remove it from the boardroom’s performative rituals and to interactions and organizations where trust, justice and answerability make {